Abstract
This article critically examines the adequacy of Nigeria’s Matrimonial Causes Act (MCA) of 1970 in addressing the nation’s rising divorce rates. It argues that the Act’s fault-based grounds for divorce are anachronistic and foster adversarial litigation, leading to procedural delays, inequitable outcomes, and inadequate protection for vulnerable parties. Through doctrinal and socio-legal analysis, the study reveals how the current framework disproportionately disadvantages women and children in matters of spousal maintenance and property distribution. By drawing comparative lessons from jurisdictions like the United Kingdom and South Africa that have adopted no-fault principles and specialized family courts, the article proposes comprehensive reforms. It concludes that modernizing the MCA is essential to align Nigeria’s family law with contemporary realities, ensuring a more efficient, accessible, and just system for resolving matrimonial causes.
Keywords: Matrimonial Causes Act, Divorce, Family Law, No-Fault Divorce, Nigeria, Judicial Reform.
1.0 Background
Marriage in Nigeria has long been regarded as a foundational institution for social stability, family continuity and communal well-being. It is embedded in customary practices, religious observances and statutory frameworks, creating strong cultural expectations of permanence and fidelity. Yet over recent years there has been a discernible rise in divorce rates across the country, challenging these traditional norms and raising urgent questions for family law. According to media reporting, Nigeria’s divorce rate reached approximately 2.9 per cent in 2023, translating into about 1.8 divorces per 1,000 persons—an alarming increase in a context where marital dissolution was historically rare (Ajayi, 2025). This trend, while modest by global standards signals a shift in marital behaviour, with young couples, dual-income families and urban centres like Lagos and Abuja increasingly initiating divorce proceedings (Ajayi, 2025). The rising incidence of divorce thus compels a critical examination of whether Nigeria’s legal regime remains fit for purpose in protecting vulnerable parties, resolving disputes equitably and preserving the social welfare aspects of marriage.
The statutory instrument that governs divorce among civil marriages in Nigeria is the Matrimonial Causes Act (MCA), which sets out grounds for dissolution, procedural safeguards and post-divorce relief such as custody, maintenance and settlement orders. Scholars note that while the MCA and associated rules remain the primary legal architecture for formal divorce, they were enacted in a very different social and economic era (Ilegbune, 1970; Ojo & Adewole, 2022). The Act presupposes a context in which marriages lasted lifelong, where spousal roles were well-defined and financial independence was limited. In contrast, modern Nigeria presents new realities: widespread female labour participation, elevated educational attainment, evolving gender roles, intensified economic pressures and shifting normative attitudes towards marriage and separation (Onyeka, 2024). Thus there is a growing disconnect between the legal text and lived experience of marital breakdown. The increasing frequency of divorce, driven by factors such as infidelity, domestic violence, financial strain and communication breakdown (Lubor, 2023), raises the question whether the MCA still provides timely, accessible and just resolution mechanisms for contemporary Nigerians.
Further compounding the challenge is the under-reporting of marital dissolution outside formal court channels, the complexity and cost of court proceedings and the slow pace of reforms to marriage‐and-divorce law in Nigeria. Some studies record that in certain urban jurisdictions thousands of divorce petitions are filed annually and yet many more separations occur informally without full legal recognition (Ojamu, 2024). Legal practitioners argue that the MCA’s grounding in litigation, its limited focus on early intervention or mediation, and its procedural rigidity impede the timely and proportionate resolution of marital crises (Ojo & Adewole, 2022). This undermines both the protective objectives of family law and the broader public interest in family stability and child welfare. It is in this climate of shifting marital expectations, emerging patterns of breakdown and challenged legal responsiveness that this study locates itself. The central question becomes whether the MCA remains adequate, or whether reform is required to align legal doctrine with the dynamic realities of divorce in Nigeria.
2.0 Aim and Objectives of the Study
The overarching aim of this research is to conduct a critical legal and policy analysis of the Matrimonial Causes Act (MCA) of 1970, assessing its adequacy as the principal statutory framework governing marital dissolution in the context of Nigeria’s rising divorce rates. This inquiry is necessitated by a demonstrable dissonance between the Act’s original design and the complex socio-legal realities of contemporary Nigerian families. The study posits that the MCA, conceived over five decades ago, may no longer be fully responsive to modern drivers of marital breakdown, thereby failing to ensure equitable and efficient resolution for divorcing spouses.
To achieve this aim, the study is guided by the following specific objectives:
- To critically evaluate the substantive provisions of the Matrimonial Causes Act, particularly its fault-based grounds for divorce and its mechanisms for ancillary relief. This involves a doctrinal analysis to identify legislative gaps and anachronisms that may impede access to justice or produce inequitable outcomes.
- To assess the efficacy and challenges of the judicial process in divorce proceedings under the MCA. This objective focuses on practical impediments, including procedural delays, case backlogs, and the capacity of the judiciary to handle the sensitive and often complex nature of family law disputes (Ade, Wellington, Adisa, Attoh, & Eliphus, 2023).
- To investigate the socio-legal impact of the MCA on vulnerable parties, with particular emphasis on the economic and social welfare of women and children post-divorce. This involves examining the Act’s provisions for spousal maintenance, property distribution, and child custody in light of persistent societal stigma and economic disparities (Adegoke, 2010).
- To undertake a comparative analysis of progressive family law reforms in select jurisdictions. The objective is to distill best practices and innovative approaches such as the incorporation of no-fault divorce principles or alternative dispute resolution models that could inform a modernised Nigerian framework.
- To formulate a coherent set of evidence-based legal and policy recommendations for legislative and judicial reform. These recommendations are intended to guide policymakers, the judiciary, and legal practitioners in aligning Nigeria’s matrimonial causes law with contemporary standards of justice, fairness, and social need.
The significance of this study lies in its potential to contribute robust scholarly insight to a domain of law that directly impacts national social stability. Its findings are intended to provide a substantive foundation for legislative review and to inform judicial practice, thereby promoting a more responsive and equitable family justice system in Nigeria.
3.0 Methodology
This study employs a doctrinal legal methodology as its foundational approach. The doctrinal method enables rigorous analysis of the written law: statutes, judicial decisions and regulatory materials. It allows for systematic examination of the provisions of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1970, how courts have interpreted those provisions, and where the law may no longer align with social reality (Adebayo et al., 2023). Primary legal sources include the MCA itself, relevant case law, and high-court decisions. Secondary legal sources include textbooks, law-review articles and policy reports. This doctrinal base ensures the research remains grounded in the black-letter law as it stands in Nigeria.
The study is complemented by a socio-legal research component. While the doctrinal method analyses law in the books, the socio-legal dimension considers how legal provisions operate in practice. This is necessary because family law is inherently dynamic and intersects with culture, gender norms, economic realities and institutional behaviour (Adekile, 2017). Drawing on empirical reports, journal articles and official government data, this part of the methodology examines how the MCA affects spouses, children and families—especially in relation to procedure, social welfare and access to justice. The combination of doctrinal and socio-legal methods ensures not only a critique of statutory content but also a realistic account of its implementation and impact.
Finally, the research adopts a comparative legal methodology to identify best practices and possible directions for reform. Comparative analysis engages jurisdictions with similar legal origins or family-law frameworks to draw lessons pertinent to Nigeria. For example, the study reviews how other common-law countries have updated matrimonial legislation to reflect no-fault divorce or modern ancillary relief (Adesanya, 2025). By juxtaposing Nigerian law with these foreign models, the research highlights both opportunities and constraints for reform in a Nigerian context. Together, the doctrinal, socio-legal and comparative methods create a robust multi-dimensional framework that supports legal and policy-oriented recommendations designed to align Nigeria’s matrimonial causes regime with contemporary needs.
4.0 Findings
This section presents the findings and discussion arising from the doctrinal, socio-legal, and comparative analyses conducted in this study. It aligns with the research objectives and methodology by evaluating the substantive provisions, judicial processes, and socio-legal implications of the Matrimonial Causes Act (MCA) 1970. Through an integrated examination of legal texts, case law, and comparative reforms, this chapter assesses the adequacy of the MCA in addressing Nigeria’s rising divorce rates and the evolving realities of family law justice.
4.1 Evaluation of the Substantive Provisions of the Matrimonial Causes Act
The Matrimonial Causes Act 1970 (MCA) remains Nigeria’s primary statutory framework for divorce and related reliefs. It is built upon a fault-based model of divorce under sections 15 and 16, which require petitioners to prove misconduct such as adultery, cruelty or desertion before dissolution may be granted. This grounding reflected the social context of the time but raises serious questions in light of today’s changing family realities (Ilegbune, 1970).
In modern Nigeria, the continued insistence on fault-based grounds is increasingly misaligned with social reality. Many marriages break down for reasons that do not neatly fit into the statutory categories of fault. As Attah (2018) notes, this system forces parties into adversarial litigation, often fabricating fault narratives just to secure a decree. In practice, justice and access to relief may be impeded by this obligation to show blame, which prolongs proceedings and increases cost and emotional strain. The fault regime therefore runs counter to concepts of equitable and efficient resolution.
The ancillary relief provisions of the MCA spousal maintenance (sections 70–71), property adjustment (section 72) and child custody (section 71)—were intended to address fallout from divorce but now appear outdated and inadequately structured. For example, legislative silence on the meaning of matrimonial property has left courts without statutory guidance. Efe (2019) argues that the absence of a defined “matrimonial property” regime undermines equitable outcomes, especially for women who may have contributed non-monetary labour to the marriage. In Attah’s study, Nigerian judicial practice is shown to favour formal ownership title over equitable contributions, disadvantaging many women (Attah, 2018). Custody determinations likewise remain uneven. While courts claim to apply the “best interest of the child” standard, judgments vary widely in practice depending on the presiding judge’s discretion rather than consistent criteria.
Judicial interpretation further complicates matters. Although the text of the MCA grants broad discretion, the resulting uneven decisions undermine predictability. In several reported cases, courts have dismissed petitions when fault-based criteria could not be strictly satisfied—even where interviews revealed clear marital breakdown—leading to results that critics describe as “technically correct but substantively unjust”. Such jurisprudence weakens creditor expectations of fairness, and in the matrimonial context weakens the protections of vulnerable spouses and children.
4.2 Efficacy and Challenges of the Judicial Process in Divorce Proceedings
This section examines the practical operation of the judicial process under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1970 (MCA) in Nigeria, revealing procedural bottlenecks, institutional deficiencies, and access-to-justice barriers. Through doctrinal and empirical analysis, the discussion highlights how case backlogs, generalist court structures, and resource constraints hinder effective resolution. It also considers how these failures particularly affect vulnerable litigants women and low-income spouses and draws on real-world examples of how delays and procedural errors undermine fair outcomes.
4.2.1 Procedural Inefficiencies and Case Backlogs
One of the most pervasive issues in divorce litigation in Nigeria is delay. Media reports show that matrimonial cases in Lagos high courts can take “donkey years” to conclude, partly because judges and registries adhere to outdated processes and because courts are overloaded (News Agency of Nigeria, 2024). Empirical data suggest that large numbers of filed divorce petitions remain pending for years—one study noted that in the Federal Capital Territory, over 2,000 divorce applications were pending with significant lag time (Adeniyi, 2024). These extended timelines undermine the purpose of the MCA, which is designed to provide timely relief for broken-down marriages.
4.2.2 Lack of Specialized Family Divisions and Judicial Capacity
Another key shortcoming is that many Nigerian courts hearing matrimonial causes are generalist high courts without dedicated family-law divisions. This structural feature means that judges often lack specialised training in family matters, which involve emotional, psychological, and social dimensions (Chaman Law Firm, 2024). Moreover, the procedural burden is high petitions must comply with fault-based grounds, mandatory reconciliation hearings and service steps, which all prolong adjudication. The absence of streamlined processes or specialised judicial panels thus contributes to inefficiency, increased litigation costs and unpredictability in outcomes.
4.2.3 Barriers to Justice for Vulnerable Litigants
Women and low-income spouses are disproportionately affected by these inefficiencies. A commentary on Nigerian divorce proceedings notes that many women avoid enforcing their rights because the process is slow, expensive and socially fraught (BarristerNG, 2024). For instance, a woman seeking maintenance may face months of procedural delay before a court makes any interim order. While the MCA allows maintenance and property adjustment, courts often lack mechanisms to enforce them within a realistic timeframe, leaving vulnerable spouses without support. Stigma and social pressure further discourage full pursuit of formal remedies.
4.2.4 Case Illustrations of Procedural Errors and Fairness Concerns
Several illustrative examples highlight how procedural defects undermine justice. For example, the Gazette NG reported a Lagos law firm referencing cases where courts subjected matrimonial petitions to excessive adjournments because of mandatory reconciliation hearings, service failures or missing documentation (Gazette NG, 2025). These procedural detours often allow the respondent to drag out the suit, intentionally or otherwise, delaying final resolution. One popular report noted that children in custody-related proceedings sometimes wait months before resolution, their welfare disadvantaged by the slow process (Punch NG, 2025).
4.2.5 Implications for Fairness and Family Justice
The cumulative effect of these challenges is a system where the formal existence of legal rights under the MCA does not guarantee timely or equitable relief. Prolonged litigation frustrates the purpose of family law and may leave parties in legal limbo. From a policy and legal-reform perspective, these findings reveal the urgent need for streamlined procedures, specialised courts or court divisions and enhanced institutional capacity. Without such reforms, the judiciary’s role in divorce proceedings will continue to lag behind the needs of a society marked by rising marital breakdown and evolving family dynamics.
4.3 Socio-Legal Impact of the Matrimonial Causes Act on Vulnerable Parties
This section examines how the Matrimonial Causes Act 1970 (MCA) affects women and children following divorce in Nigeria. Despite its role as the principal statutory framework for dissolution of marriage, the Act’s provisions for ancillary relief such as maintenance, property adjustment and child custody often fail to protect vulnerable parties effectively. Empirical and doctrinal findings reveal significant economic, social and procedural gaps that amplify disadvantage for women and children in post-divorce contexts.
The MCA grants courts power under Section 70 for maintenance of spouses and children, and under Section 72 for settlement of property (Alloh, 2019). Yet research shows that maintenance orders are seldom enforced or sufficiently structured. A study by Nwauzi and Akolokwu (2018) found that although Section 70 empowers a court to order maintenance, judicial practice still reflects common-law bias and gendered assumptions—leaving many women without effective support (Nwauzi & Akolokwu, 2018). On property rights, Efe (2019) argues that the lack of a statutory definition of “matrimonial property” undermines equitable division of assets. Women who contributed non-monetarily during marriage therefore often receive minimal or no share of realisable assets. This economic insecurity ties to increased vulnerabilities for women after divorce, especially given limited interim relief and slow court decisions.
For children and child custody, the MCA does not explicitly address the evolving welfare needs of children from broken homes, nor does it lay down clear criteria for assessing parental fitness beyond broad “best interest of the child” standards. Recent coverage of custody battles noted that children are often branded as “from broken homes,” and many courts duplicate societal stigma rather than reducing it (Joseph, 2025). The lack of psychological support frameworks or systematic welfare assessments means that children’s rights may be compromised. Action4Justice (n.d.) reports that despite statutory equality, in practice many mothers lose custody due to patriarchal interpretations of the law base, and fathers retain advantage under customary or religious norms.
Social stigma compounds these structural weaknesses. Divorce continues to carry cultural shame in many Nigerian communities—and women in particular face a double burden of financial instability and social ostracism (BarristerNG, 2024). The MCA does not expressly account for domestic violence or psychological harm as grounds for divorce or enhanced relief, meaning victims may be forced into fault-based proceedings that require proof of cruelty or adultery, increasing cost and length of litigation. As Adoga-Ikong and Ibekwe (2017) note, maintenance and ancillary orders “are ordered by the court either pending final determination or at the end of the suit,” but the system lacks clear enforcement, leaving many women with relief in name only.
In sum, the MCA’s formal mechanisms are inadequate in meeting the socio-legal needs of vulnerable parties. Economic disadvantage, social stigma and lack of specialised welfare assessment combine to worsen outcomes for women and children. For the MCA to deliver justice, reform must go beyond procedural tweaks to include clearer definitions, stronger enforcement mechanisms, recognition of domestic violence and psychosocial harms, and support systems for children’s welfare in divorce proceedings.
4.4 Comparative Insights from Other Jurisdictions
Examining other common-law jurisdictions offers perspective on how Nigeria’s divorce framework under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1970 might evolve to better serve justice, efficiency, and social welfare. The experiences of the United Kingdom, South Africa, and Kenya reveal a gradual movement toward no-fault principles, structured mediation, and specialised family-court systems.
United Kingdom
In the United Kingdom, the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020—which came into force in April 2022—formally introduced a no-fault divorce regime. The reform removed the need to prove adultery, desertion, or unreasonable behaviour, allowing couples to dissolve their marriage simply on the basis of irretrievable breakdown (The Law Society, 2022). This shift reflects an effort to reduce hostility and emotional harm during proceedings while expediting resolution.
Legal scholars note that the change has improved procedural clarity and allowed the courts to focus on financial settlements and the welfare of children rather than assigning blame (Miles, 2022). For Nigeria, which still relies heavily on fault-based grounds, this reform suggests the possibility of a more conciliatory and accessible divorce process.
South Africa
South Africa’s family-law system offers another useful model. Mediation and alternative dispute resolution (ADR) are becoming central to family-court practice, supported by judicial endorsement and statutory encouragement (De Jong, 2010). Scholars argue that mediation not only reduces delays and costs but also preserves post-divorce relationships, especially where children are involved (Kgosimore, 2019).
Recent academic discourse also supports the creation of a dedicated family-law court with specialised officers trained to handle sensitive emotional and social dimensions of marital breakdown (De Jong, 2005). Nigeria’s judicial system—often strained by heavy dockets and limited infrastructure—could benefit from such institutional specialisation.
Kenya
Kenya’s Marriage Act 2014 introduced “irretrievable breakdown” as a ground for divorce, blending fault and no-fault elements. Yet, commentators argue that the law remains overly rigid, and judicial attitudes still favour proof of fault (Mukono, 2022). The persistence of adversarial culture, coupled with the absence of widespread ADR structures, continues to hinder timely and humane outcomes.
For Nigeria, Kenya’s experience offers a cautionary example: statutory reform without institutional and cultural adaptation may yield limited progress. Legislative updates must be matched by public education, judicial training, and accessible mediation systems.
Lessons and Adaptation for Nigeria
Across these jurisdictions, three core lessons emerge. First, no-fault divorce enhances dignity and efficiency by removing unnecessary acrimony. Second, structured mediation and ADR mechanisms promote fairness while easing the court’s workload. Third, specialised family divisions staffed by trained judges and counsellors—help address the social and psychological realities of divorce.
Nevertheless, Nigeria must adapt such reforms carefully. Cultural norms, religious values, and moral sensitivities still shape perceptions of marriage and divorce. Reform should therefore pursue a balanced approach—modernising procedure without eroding cultural legitimacy.
In summary, comparative insights point to a pragmatic path forward: a Nigerian divorce regime that blends the procedural clarity of no-fault principles, the restorative character of mediation, and the contextual sensitivity required by local values.
4.5 Policy and Legal Reform Recommendations
The assessment of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1970 (MCA) through doctrinal, procedural, and socio-legal lenses reveals that reform is not merely desirable but overdue. The law, while once progressive, now lags behind social realities and modern conceptions of justice. A reformed matrimonial framework must therefore align with constitutional values, gender equity, and international best practices without losing sight of Nigeria’s cultural context.
- Substantive Reform of the Matrimonial Causes Act
The MCA’s fault-based model, enshrined under Sections 15 and 16, should be restructured to incorporate no-fault divorce principles, allowing couples to dissolve marriage based on “irretrievable breakdown” without the burden of proving blame (Miles, 2022). This reform will protect the dignity of parties and reduce adversarial hostility. Such a move aligns with the United Kingdom’s Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020 and Kenya’s Marriage Act 2014, both of which reflect a modern understanding that failed marriages need resolution, not retribution (Mukono, 2022).
Moreover, ambiguous provisions on spousal maintenance and property distribution require clearer legislative standards to guide judicial discretion and ensure consistency. Current disparities in judicial interpretation, particularly on what constitutes “just and equitable” distribution, often disadvantage women, especially where marital assets are informally owned (Ekhator, 2023). Reform should introduce guidelines similar to South Africa’s Matrimonial Property Act 1984, which provides for equitable sharing based on direct and indirect contributions (De Jong, 2005).
- Establishment of a Specialised Family Court System
Judicial efficiency remains constrained by structural bottlenecks. The establishment of Family Court Divisions within the Federal and State High Courts, as seen in South Africa and the United Kingdom, is vital. Such divisions should operate with simplified procedures, counselling support, and gender-sensitive officers trained in family law (De Jong, 2010).
Specialisation will allow judges to manage the emotional and social dimensions of divorce, child custody, and maintenance cases more effectively. The Family Court of Australia model provides a functional precedent where therapeutic jurisprudence and interdisciplinary support (psychologists, mediators, and social workers) enhance justice delivery (Parkinson, 2019). Nigeria’s judicial system, burdened by heavy dockets and procedural rigidity, needs this pragmatic restructuring to make family justice accessible and humane.
- Integration of No-Fault Divorce and ADR Mechanisms
Introducing statutory mediation and conciliation at the pre-trial stage will help decongest the courts and promote reconciliation where possible. Evidence from South Africa shows that mediation significantly reduces both costs and emotional strain (Kgosimore, 2019). Nigeria’s reform blueprint should therefore mandate compulsory mediation before litigation, particularly in cases involving children or complex property disputes.
No-fault divorce should not be seen as undermining moral values but rather as a reflection of compassion and procedural fairness. By recognising irretrievable breakdown as a sufficient ground, the law will shift focus from blame to resolution—allowing parties to part ways without undue humiliation or delay.
- Capacity-Building for Judicial and Legal Officers
The competence of the judiciary and legal practitioners determines the success of any reform. Continuous training and capacity-building programmes on family law, gender justice, and trauma-informed adjudication are essential. Such programmes can be implemented through the National Judicial Institute (NJI) and Nigerian Law School partnerships with international family-law institutes (Ekhator, 2023).
Additionally, technology should be deployed to support electronic filing, case tracking, and virtual mediation. The COVID-19 era demonstrated the feasibility of remote hearings in civil proceedings (Nweze, 2021). Institutionalising these innovations within family law practice will promote efficiency and accessibility.
- Towards a Coherent Policy Framework
Ultimately, reform of the MCA must not occur in isolation. It should form part of a National Family Policy Framework anchored on human dignity, child welfare, and gender equity. The policy should harmonise overlapping laws, including the Child Rights Act 2003 and Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act 2015, ensuring uniform application across states.
5.0 Conclusion
The analysis of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1970 underscores a fundamental truth. Nigeria’s matrimonial law, though once progressive, no longer meets the demands of a changing society. The study revealed that the Act’s fault-based divorce system, procedural rigidity, and inadequate provisions for maintenance and custody have deepened the hardships of divorcing spouses, particularly women and children. The absence of specialised family courts, coupled with judicial backlogs, has further undermined access to justice and delayed the resolution of marital disputes. Comparative lessons from jurisdictions such as the United Kingdom, South Africa, and Kenya demonstrate that legal systems embracing no-fault divorce, mediation, and equitable property division have achieved greater efficiency and fairness. Reforming the MCA must therefore go beyond textual amendment to include structural, procedural, and cultural transformation. Establishing family court divisions, integrating alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, and enhancing judicial capacity are essential steps toward a more humane and accessible family justice system. Ultimately, aligning the MCA with constitutional values, gender equity, and international standards will not only strengthen the administration of matrimonial justice but also promote social stability and the protection of vulnerable family members in Nigeria’s evolving legal landscape.
References
Action4Justice. (n.d.). Child custody and property rights in marriage – Nigeria. Retrieved from https://nigeria.action4justice.org/legal_areas/women%27s-rights-focusing-on-marriage-rights/child-custody-and-property-rights-in-marriage/?lang=en
Adebayo, J., Ikonne, D., Ihekoronye, U. S., & Nzenwata, M. U. (2023). Contemporary issues under the Nigerian family law: The need for legislative review to catalyse growth. OAU Law Journal. Retrieved fromhttps://oaulj.oauife.edu.ng/index.php/oaulj/article/download/9/8/14
Adekile, O. M. (2017). Towards the development of a marital property regime for Nigeria: A case for socio-legal research for gender justice. Unilag Journal of Humanities, 4(2), 97–114.
Adeniyi, F. (2024). Rising rate of divorce and backlog in court filings in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Social Problems & Social Policy Review, 4(2). Retrieved from https://www.nigerianjournalsonline.com/index.php/NJSPSPR/article/download/5068/4926/
Adesanya, D. S. (2025). Alternative dispute resolution as a viable template for the resolution of family disputes in Nigeria. Law & World Review of Contemporary Legal Issues. Retrieved from https://lawandworld.ge/index.php/law/article/view/842
Adoga-Ikong, J. A., & Ibekwe, A. F. (2017). Maintenance order under the common law and Matrimonial Causes Act: A relief or punishment? Pinisi Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Studies.
Ajayi, O. V. (2025, June 5). How divorce rises in Nigeria. New Daily Prime. Retrieved from https://newdailyprime.news/opinion/how-divorce-rises-in-nigeria/
Alloh, B. O. (2019). Application of the law of maintenance under Section 70 of the Matrimonial Causes Act, Cap M7, LFN 2004. International Journal of Comparative Law and Legal Philosophy (IJOCLLEP), 1(2).
Attah, M. (2018). Divorcing marriage from marital assets: Why equity and women fail in property readjustment actions in Nigeria. Journal of African Law, 62(3), 427-446. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855318000207
BarristerNG. (2024, January 15). Custody battles and property wars: Legal rights in modern marriages and divorce. Retrieved from https://barristerng.com/custody-battles-and-property-wars-legal-rights-in-modern-marriages-and-divorce/
Chaman Law Firm. (2024, May). Family courts and specialised tribunals: Transformative justice in Nigeria. Retrieved from https://chamanlawfirm.com/family-courts-and-specialized-tribunals/
De Jong, M. (2005). An acceptable, applicable and accessible family-law system for South Africa: Some suggestions concerning a family court and divorce mediation. University of South Africa Institutional Repository. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/21633
De Jong, M. (2010). A humanistic approach to divorce and family mediation in the South African context. African Journal on Conflict Resolution, 10(3), 65–90. https://www.accord.org.za/ajcr-issues/a-humanistic-approach-to-divorce-and-family-mediation-in-the-south-african-context/
Efe, C. J. (2019). The need for the statutory introduction of the concept of “matrimonial property” in Nigeria. Journal of African Law, 63(1), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855319000046
Ekhator, E. O. (2023). Gender (in)equality and family law reform in Nigeria: Policy gaps and pathways for transformation. Journal of African Law, 67(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021855323000127
Ilegbune, C. U. (1970). A critique of the Nigerian law of divorce under the Matrimonial Causes Decree 1970. Journal of African Law, 14(3), 178-197.
Joseph, T. (2025, July 16). Legal experts call for stronger custody reforms to protect children of divorce. Independent Newspaper Nigeria.
Kgosimore, D. (2019). Restorative justice and family dispute resolution in South Africa. Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal, 22(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2019/v22i0a4668
Lubor, P. (2023, February 15). Why there’s high rate of divorce in Nigeria. Pulse Nigeria. Retrieved from https://www.pulse.ng/articles/local/why-theres-high-rate-of-divorce-in-nigeria-stakeholders-2024072607290995911
Miles, J. (2022). No-fault divorce and the future of family justice in England and Wales. Family Law Review, 34(2), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/eqac012
Mukono, M. (2022). Divorce law in Kenya: In support of a uniform no-fault regime. Strathmore Law Review, 7(1), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.52907/slr.v7i1.195
News Agency of Nigeria. (2024, June 2). Divorce: Court, sentiments cause delays in marital lawsuits, lawyers lament. The Gazette NG. Retrieved from https://gazettengr.com/divorce-court-sentiments-cause-delays-in-marital-lawsuits-lawyers-lament/
Nwauzi, L. O., & Akolokwu, G. (2018). Maintenance under the Matrimonial Causes Act: Examining the realities and illusion. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333339984_Maintenance_Under_the_Matrimonial_Causes_Act_Examining_the_Realities_and_Illusion
Nweze, C. (2021). Technology and access to justice in Nigeria: Lessons from COVID-19 judicial adaptations. African Human Rights Law Journal, 21(2), 673–695. https://doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2021/v21n2a17
Ojamu, E. (2024). Marital dissolution and legal recognition in urban Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Social Problems & Social Policy Review, 4(2), 29-45.
Ojo, M. O., & Adewole, A. (2022). The Matrimonial Causes Act: Adequacy in modern Nigeria. International Journal of Law Policy and Family Studies, 8(2), 66-83.
Onyeka, E. (2024). Contemporary marriage patterns and family law challenges in Nigeria. African Journal of Family Law, 3(1), 12-30.
Parkinson, P. (2019). Family law and the indissolubility of parenthood. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108615084
Punch NG. (2025, April 10). Silent victims: How divorce impacts children in Nigeria. Retrieved from https://www.punchng.com/silent-victims-children-bear-the-brunt-of-broken-marriages-divorce-surge-1/
The Law Society. (2022, April 5). No-fault divorce. Retrieved from https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/topics/family-and-children/no-fault-divorce
NOAH AJARE ESQ.